The 1982 Movie Poltergeist Used Real Skeletons As – Tymoff

The 1982 Movie Poltergeist Used Real Skeletons As – Tymoff

The 1982 horror classic “Poltergeist” continues to send shivers down spines, not just for its chilling portrayal of a haunted house, but also for a persistent rumor: the film used real human skeletons as props. This article delves into the controversy, separating fact from fiction.

Exploring the Controversy: The Use of Real Skeletons in “Poltergeist”

Origins of the Claim

The rumor of real skeletons in “Poltergeist” has swirled for decades. Actresses JoBeth Williams and Zelda Rubinstein both recounted feeling unsettled while filming scenes with skeletons submerged in a pool. This fueled speculation that the props were more than just plastic replicas.

Unveiling the Truth

While the rumor holds some truth, it’s not entirely accurate. Special effects makeup artist Craig Reardon confirmed under oath that some, not all, of the skeletons in the infamous pool scene were indeed real. The primary reason? They were cheaper to acquire than high-quality plastic props. However, Williams later revealed she was unaware of this during filming, making the experience even more unsettling.

Insights from Spielberg and Crew Responses

Director Steven Spielberg has never explicitly addressed the use of real skeletons. However, considering the era’s film production practices and Reardon’s admission, it’s likely the claim has some basis.

The Impact on the Film Industry

Contemporary Film Production and Ethical Standards

Today, with advancements in special effects technology, the use of real human remains is highly uncommon. Ethical considerations and stricter regulations have made replicated props the standard.

The Disturbing Trend of Fatalities After Production

The “Poltergeist” curse, a series of tragic deaths and accidents surrounding cast and crew members, further fueled the controversy. While such events were likely unrelated, they added a layer of unease to the real skeleton debate.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

The legality of using real skeletons in film props can vary by region. However, ethical concerns and potential emotional distress for actors and crew have made it an undesirable practice.

The Emotional Toll on Cast and Crew

The On-Set Atmosphere During Filming

The use of real skeletons, even if unintentional, likely contributed to an unsettling atmosphere on set. Filming a horror movie can already be emotionally demanding, and this added layer could have amplified those feelings.

The Aftermath of Using Real Skeletons and an On-Set Exorcism

Rumors of an on-set exorcism further fueled the “Poltergeist” curse narrative. Whether true or not, it highlights the emotional weight such practices can carry.

Behind the Curtain: The Choice for Authenticity

The filmmakers might have chosen real skeletons in an attempt to achieve greater realism. However, this decision, while understandable in its context, ultimately created more issues than it solved.

The Wider Impact and Reflection on Society

Encouraging Transparency and Responsibility

Filmmakers have a responsibility to be transparent with actors and crew about the materials used in props. This fosters trust and protects their well-being.

Understanding Viewer Anxiety

The prospect of using human remains in a horror film can be unsettling for viewers. Transparency and responsible production practices are crucial to maintain audience trust.

Advancements in Special Effects Technology and Their Influence

Modern special effects technology allows for incredibly realistic props, eliminating the need for controversial methods.

The Legacy of the “Poltergeist” Controversy on Future Filmmaking

The “Poltergeist” controversy serves as a reminder of the ethical considerations filmmakers must prioritize. It paved the way for more responsible practices and advancements in prop creation.

Conclusion

The “Poltergeist” real skeleton rumor, while partially true, had a lasting impact on the film industry. It highlighted ethical concerns, prompted a shift towards responsible practices, and ultimately served as a cautionary tale for future filmmakers. The legacy of “Poltergeist” extends beyond the big screen, reminding us of the importance of transparency, respect, and ethical decision-making in the creative process.